Tuesday, April 7, 2009

FDA using new guidelines detrimental to industry?


Spinach --- Tomatoes --- Peanuts --- Pistachios --- Spices --- what's next?
The FDA has a new attitude in responding to the events in the interest of public safety. It's pretty simple... Kill the herd, we'll find the infected one later. Please read these two articles.. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/health/policy/07food.html?_r=2&emc=eta1 and http://cnnwire.blogs.cnn.com/2009/03/31/take-pistachios-off-your-menu-fda-advises/ .
Very short summary.... on March 24, 2009, Kraft Foods notifies FDA that they have found salmonella in pistachios during their testing and traced it back to one company operation in California. ON March 31, 2009, FDA tells consumers to take ALL pistachios off the menu.

Is this type of reaction over-reacting? Yes and No. If this action saves one life then it is hard to disagree with the action taken by the FDA. However, is it fair to shut down an entire industry when the notification also included the traceback to the supplier? If the FDA controlled the auto industry and found brakes to be faulty on one brand, would it be fair to tell the consumers not to buy ANY car?

I sympathize with Dr. David Acheson. Although I cannot agree with every move made by the FDA, my respect for this man is unwaverable. He has done more than any individual, in my opinion, to create and expand the awareness and the criticalness of the food safety issues that we face. This will eventually lead to more correct answers, more viable solutions and more solid food safety programs.

The new O'Bama administration, putting new faces and names at the top of the FDA, is already making changes, establishing their priorities and implementing short term solutions to protect the public.... even though it is at a potentially great expense to the industry.

Last week some of my group was in DC and we met with both political and industry groups. You cannot pick up a major paper it seems these days without finding an article on food safety, epidemiology, traceability, consumer protection on food and other areas. It is a hot item, a public item, an item both republicans and democrats can get behind and they are doing it.

The articles above indicate the importance of what we at http://www.usfoodtrace/ are doing. We address both traceability and epidemiology as well as a centralized data base. This combination is critical in determination of ground zero of an event when it does occur. Determining ground zero as quickly as possible is imperative in helping the industry avert losses when problems do occur.

Consider this based on two articles.... if you were a company spending hundreds of thousands of dollars per year on food safety to insure that your product was indeed safe, but another company of any size does not follow or ignores this area and has a problem that becomes known to the FDA....both companies are treated equally now based on the FDA response on pistachios. Not only those two companies, but any others producing the same product now have a greater potential to get shut down.

It reminds me of the tomato issue last year.... if one tomato is bad, shut the industry down until we find out!!! BUT...oh wait.... it wasn't tomatoes after all.... too bad.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Congressional Hearing March 11, 2009

The hearing today brought together some industry experts as well as knowledgeable people that understand government and how the FDA operates. The message to be taken here is that the government IS going to act regarding food safety. The question is which direction they may go. Rather than attempt to put any "spin" on this hearing, I leave the link here for your review and your input. http://energycommerce.edgeboss.net/wmedia/energycommerce/2009.03.11.sc.he.wvx

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Summary of some food safety failures by the FDA
















The tomato industry lost $250 million dollars during the summer of 2008. Why? Because the FDA told the nation to stop buying tomatoes because they "thought" they were the cause of a massive salmonella outbreak that sickened approximately 40,000 people in the United States. The FDA was actually not able to implicate ONE tomato to the event. The first illness was on April 16, 2008 according the CDC, the last illness reported was on August 11, 2008. It turned out to be jalapeno peppers, but only after 85 days and 1250 reported cases (which means approximately 36,000 people were sick) did the FDA get it right.






In 2006, the E-Coli outbreak that involved spinach only lasted a few weeks, but there were significant illnesses and there were deaths associated with that outbreak. The efforts of the FDA and the government were swifter and more effective in that situation than in the salmonella event last summer.




The current peanut event is another instance of the FDA showing their weakness in being able to handle outbreaks in an efficient and consumer protective method. The first illness was reported in either late August or early September. The public was notified in early January, at least 4 months after it began. By the time the public was notified there had been over 300 cases reported, which means at least 9,000 people had gotten sick. It continues with over 12,000 people having gotten sick at the time of this posting and there have been 5 deaths which "may" be associated with this outbreak. To date there have been over 150 recalls by various companies on peanut products from peanut butter to dog biscuits and everything in between.


It doesn't have to be this way and it is the intent of www.usfoodtrace.com to change this. We need all the support we can get in letting our local, state and federal representatives know that not only has the past been so inadequately handled, but a part of the change that is needed is here and ready to be implemented. We appreciate any thoughts and comments. This is the initial posting on this subject and we will continue this process to inform the public, make our program known and get it implemented. Please visit us at www.usfoodtrace.com to learn more about what has happened, what we are all about and give us your thoughts.